Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Monday, 14 April 2014
Saturday, 12 April 2014
Thursday, 10 April 2014
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Monday, 7 April 2014
Evaluation Question 3
First of all, we did
a preliminary exercise. This involved getting used to lip synching. So we had
to film someone singing the song and then repeat it from different angles. Then
we had to cut out the sound to and replace it with the song. Once we finished editing
it, we put it on YouTube and received a lot of feedback. Many people said that
the editing to the beat is good. But also the majority of people said that the
lip synching was not in time. Frome receiving this feedback I came to a
conclusion that I need to work more on making the lip synching perfect as this would
hypothetically make or break my music video. I took this into account when I commenced
with the construction of my music video.
Eventually I made the rough cut of my music video. I also received
a lot of feedback for the draft. One
person said that the beginning of the song should be more lively. From this I
really had to think of how I could make the beginning more exciting. To make
the beginning better I added an intro for the song. Also, after the intro, instead
of just showing the character walking, I kept on cutting (with the beat) from
the character walking to the character walking with his girlfriend.
After a short while I finished the music video. I put it on YouTube
and once again received a lot of feedback. One negative thing was that many people
said the music video lacks a clear story line. Many people asked if there was a
story line or that they didn’t understand the story line. If I had the chance
to repeat the process, I would have tried my best to make the storyline of the
music video as clear as possible. A positive thing was that most people liked
the intro of the music video and the cuts between the character on his own
walking and the character with his girlfriend. Ultimately from the feedback I have
received, the music video as a success.
Saturday, 5 April 2014
Cultivation Theory
Cultivation theory was a theory composed originally by G.
Gerbner and later expanded upon by Gerbner & Gross , they began research in
the mid-1960s trying to study media
effects, specifically whether watching television has an influence on the
audiences idea and perception of everyday life. Cultivation theory states that high frequency
viewers of television are more susceptible to media messages and the belief
that they are real and valid. Heavy viewers are exposed to more violence and
therefore are affected by the Mean World Syndrome, the belief that the world is
a far worse and dangerous place then it actually is.
Cultivation research is one that studies media effects (in
my opinion one of the most controversial areas of media research). Cultivation
theorists posit that television viewing can have long-term effects that
gradually affect the audience. Their primary focus falls on the effects of
viewing in the attitudes of the viewer as opposed to created behaviour.
Friday, 4 April 2014
Two step flow theory

Critics:
-Researchers found substantial evidence that initial mass
media information flows directly to people on the whole and is not relayed by
opinion leaders.
-The two-step hypothesis does not adequately describe the
flow of learning. Lazarsfeld and his associates in the 1940 election study were
unable to determine the specific flow of influence.
- Today most of the advertising researches are based on this
theory. Especially opinion leader’s role in the society as well as in home to
which helps to improve the market with less efforts.
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
Genre
Audiences develop an understanding that certain expectations my be fulfilled and they may find pleasure in predicting what will happen next.
Genres have characteristic features that are known to and recognised by audiences. This formula is produced again and again. For example, in a western we see similar characters, situations and settings.
A big example for horrors is in the film called scream. The film tells us the rules of the genre, shows what's going to happen and then the film shows it happening. This is also a prime example of postmodernism. Audiences recognise key elements of a genre and react differently to each genre. These key elements are known as paradigms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)